Siddharth Mahavir SPML Through P.O.A. Dellip Vijaykumar Kotecha vs Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation Through Executive Director — 1/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
Commercial Suit
CNR: MHBU040008932024
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
e-Filing Number
02-07-2024
Filing Number
399/2024
Filing Date
03-07-2024
Registration No
1/2024
Registration Date
03-07-2024
Court
District and Session Court ,khamgaon
Judge
2-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Siddharth Mahavir SPML Through P.O.A. Dellip Vijaykumar Kotecha
Adv. Phirke MB
Respondent(s)
Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation Through Executive Director
Executive Engineer, Jigaon Lift Irrigation Division
Adv. Banarase AS
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Hearing |
| 15-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 25-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 04-02-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The District Court of Khamgaon rejected the defendant's application seeking rejection of the plaintiff's commercial suit. The court found that although Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 mandates pre-litigation mediation, this requirement does not apply when urgent interim relief is sought—which the plaintiff did by filing a temporary injunction application. The court held that the suit is not barred by law and dismissed the defendant's application with cost in favor of the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The District Court of Khamgaon rejected the defendant's application seeking rejection of the plaintiff's commercial suit. The court found that although Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 mandates pre-litigation mediation, this requirement does not apply when urgent interim relief is sought—which the plaintiff did by filing a temporary injunction application. The court held that the suit is not barred by law and dismissed the defendant's application with cost in favor of the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts