Siddharth Mahavir SPML Through P.O.A. Dellip Vijaykumar Kotecha vs Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation Through Executive Director — 1/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
Commercial Suit
CNR: MHBU040008932024
e-Filing Number
02-07-2024
Filing Number
399/2024
Filing Date
03-Jul-2024
Registration No
1/2024
Registration Date
03-Jul-2024
Court
District and Session Court ,khamgaon
Judge
2-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Siddharth Mahavir SPML Through P.O.A. Dellip Vijaykumar Kotecha
Adv. Phirke MB
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation Through Executive Director
-
2.Executive Engineer, Jigaon Lift Irrigation Division
Adv. Banarase AS
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Hearing
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
-
15-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dist.judge-I Additional Sessions Judge Khamgaon.
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dist.judge-I Additional Sessions Judge Khamgaon.
-
04-Feb-2026
Hearing
Dist.judge-I Additional Sessions Judge Khamgaon.
-
03-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
SUMMARY: The District Court of Khamgaon rejected the defendant's application seeking rejection of the plaintiff's commercial suit. The court found that although Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 mandates pre-litigation mediation, this requirement does not apply when urgent interim relief is sought—which the plaintiff did by filing a temporary injunction application. The court held that the suit is not barred by law and dismissed the defendant's application with cost in favor of the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jan-2026
Hearing
Dist.judge-I Additional Sessions Judge Khamgaon.
-
20-Dec-2025
Order on Exh
Dist.judge-I Additional Sessions Judge Khamgaon.
-
10-Dec-2025
Order on Exh
Dist.judge-I Additional Sessions Judge Khamgaon.
-
12-Nov-2025
Hearing
Dist.judge-I Additional Sessions Judge Khamgaon.
-
15-Oct-2025
Hearing
Dist.judge-I Additional Sessions Judge Khamgaon.
-
08-Oct-2025
Hearing
Dist.judge-I Additional Sessions Judge Khamgaon.
-
03-Sep-2025
Reply/Say
Dist.judge-I Additional Sessions Judge Khamgaon.
-
08-Aug-2025
Reply/Say
Dist.judge-I Additional Sessions Judge Khamgaon.
-
17-Jun-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
-
03-May-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
-
09-Apr-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
-
15-Mar-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
-
14-Feb-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
-
29-Jan-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
-
04-Jan-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
-
03-Dec-2024
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
-
04-Nov-2024
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
-
11-Oct-2024
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
-
13-Sep-2024
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
-
31-Aug-2024
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
-
17-Aug-2024
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
-
12-Jul-2024
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
-
09-Jul-2024
First Order
District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
-
04-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2024
SUMMARY: The District Court of Khamgaon rejected the defendant's application seeking rejection of the plaintiff's commercial suit. The court found that although Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 mandates pre-litigation mediation, this requirement does not apply when urgent interim relief is sought—which the plaintiff did by filing a temporary injunction application. The court held that the suit is not barred by law and dismissed the defendant's application with cost in favor of the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts