State of Maharashtra vs Sk. Taslim Sk. Ajim — 31/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,366(a),376(2)(N),34. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 28th May 2026.

Spl.Case

CNR: MHBU040004332024

Charge

Next Hearing

28th May 2026

Filing Number

247/2024

Filing Date

30-03-2024

Registration No

31/2024

Registration Date

30-03-2024

Court

District and Session Court ,khamgaon

Judge

2-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon

FIR Details

FIR Number

0055

Police Station

Khamgaon Gramin

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 363,366,366(a),376(2)(N),34
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act Section 3(1)(w)(i),3(1)(w)(ii),3(2)(va),3(2)(v)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,17

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Sk. Taslim Sk. Ajim

Sk. Samir Sk. Kalu

Jamilabi Sk Salim

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon

11-03-2026

Charge

03-02-2026

Charge

20-12-2025

Charge

28-10-2025

Charge

20-08-2025

Appearance

Interim Orders

12-08-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the application for release of a seized Honda CB Shine motorcycle (Crime No. 55/2024) to applicant Shaikh Qayyum Shaikh Salim, who proved ownership via RC Book. The motorcycle was released on a Supuratnama bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with conditions that the applicant shall not alter the vehicle and must produce it during trial; police were directed to photograph the vehicle at applicant's expense for identification purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the application for release of a seized Honda CB Shine motorcycle (Crime No. 55/2024) to applicant Shaikh Qayyum Shaikh Salim, who proved ownership via RC Book. The motorcycle was released on a Supuratnama bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with conditions that the applicant shall not alter the vehicle and must produce it during trial; police were directed to photograph the vehicle at applicant's expense for identification purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court ,khamgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case