Sadashiv Rajaram Nimbolkar vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - APP — 98/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBU040004182026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
214/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
98/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,khamgaon
Judge
4-Adhoc DJ - 1 AND A.S.J., Khamgaon
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
115
Police Station
Sonala
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sadashiv Rajaram Nimbolkar
Adv. Kharat MS
Mohan Sadashiv Nimbolkar
Adv. Kharat MS
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Adhoc DJ - 1 AND A.S.J., Khamgaon
Disposed
Order
Hearing
Hearing
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Order |
| 25-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 24-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 20-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY The Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, granted pre-arrest bail to both accused (Sadashiv Rajaram Nimbolkar and Mohan Sadashiv Nimbolkar) in a case involving charges of trespass, outraging modesty, and criminal intimidation against a woman. The court held that anticipatory bail is maintainable even after charge-sheet filing and cognizance, provided the accused has not been arrested and continues to apprehend arrest. The accused were released on ₹25,000 PR bonds each with conditions prohibiting evidence tampering and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, granted pre-arrest bail to both accused (Sadashiv Rajaram Nimbolkar and Mohan Sadashiv Nimbolkar) in a case involving charges of trespass, outraging modesty, and criminal intimidation against a woman. The court held that anticipatory bail is maintainable even after charge-sheet filing and cognizance, provided the accused has not been arrested and continues to apprehend arrest. The accused were released on ₹25,000 PR bonds each with conditions prohibiting evidence tampering and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts