The State of Maharashtra vs Arvind Pralhad Pachpor Advocate - Shaikh Altaf Yamin — 500031/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307, 302. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBU040003782014
Next Hearing
26th May 2026
Filing Number
500225/2014
Filing Date
09-05-2014
Registration No
500031/2014
Registration Date
09-05-2014
Court
District and Session Court ,khamgaon
Judge
3-Adhoc DJ - 2 and A.S.J., Khamgaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
13
Police Station
Hiwarkhed
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Arvind Pralhad Pachpor Advocate - Shaikh Altaf Yamin
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Adhoc DJ - 2 and A.S.J., Khamgaon
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 02-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the accused Arvind's application seeking production of hospital bed head tickets (MLC papers) and witness statements recorded during investigation. The court held that bed head tickets are public documents obtainable directly from hospitals through proper procedure, and witness statements recorded under Section 161 CrPC need not be separately produced as they are already filed on record for prosecution witnesses. The accused was directed to obtain these documents himself following due process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the accused Arvind's application seeking production of hospital bed head tickets (MLC papers) and witness statements recorded during investigation. The court held that bed head tickets are public documents obtainable directly from hospitals through proper procedure, and witness statements recorded under Section 161 CrPC need not be separately produced as they are already filed on record for prosecution witnesses. The accused was directed to obtain these documents himself following due process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts