Pankaj Ashok Sonone vs State of Maharashtra. Advocate - APP — 93/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBU040003682026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
205/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
93/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,khamgaon
Judge
1-DIST.JUDGE-I ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE KHAMGAON.
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
75
Police Station
Shegaon Gramin
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pankaj Ashok Sonone
Adv. Dambelkar AG
Kailas Prakash Daberao
Adv. Dambelkar AG
Vishal Ramdas Shelarkar
Adv. Dambelkar AG
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra. Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DIST.JUDGE-I ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE KHAMGAON.
Disposed
Order
Hearing
Hearing
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 09-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted bail to three accused (Pankaj Ashok Sonone, Kailas Prakash Daberao, and Vishal Ramdas Shelarkar) in a case involving alleged online fraud and extortion. The judge found that police interrogation was complete with no recoveries, and the accused's presence was not essential for arresting an absconded co-accused, making continued detention unjustified. The accused were released on personal recognizance bonds of Rs.25,000 each with conditions including mandatory appearance thrice weekly and prohibition against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted bail to three accused (Pankaj Ashok Sonone, Kailas Prakash Daberao, and Vishal Ramdas Shelarkar) in a case involving alleged online fraud and extortion. The judge found that police interrogation was complete with no recoveries, and the accused's presence was not essential for arresting an absconded co-accused, making continued detention unjustified. The accused were released on personal recognizance bonds of Rs.25,000 each with conditions including mandatory appearance thrice weekly and prohibition against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts