State of Maharashtra.. vs Devidas Ganpat Raut Advocate - Thate R.S — 21/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,354,452,506. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBU040003392024
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
Filing Number
194/2024
Filing Date
06-03-2024
Registration No
21/2024
Registration Date
06-03-2024
Court
District and Session Court ,khamgaon
Judge
2-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
246
Police Station
Khamgaon Shivaji Nagaar
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra..
Adv. Alsi RA
Respondent(s)
Devidas Ganpat Raut Advocate - Thate R.S
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 04-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Interim Orders
Summary: The second regular bail application of accused Devidas Ganpat Raut in a rape case (Crime No. 246/2024, under IPC Sections 354, 452, 506, and 376) was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon on 02 August 2025. The court found sufficient evidence of sexual assault based on the victim's medical examination showing a completely torn hymen, biological samples, and eight prosecution witnesses already examined, with trial nearing conclusion. The judge found no substance to release the accused on bail given the serious nature and gravity of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The second regular bail application of accused Devidas Ganpat Raut in a rape case (Crime No. 246/2024, under IPC Sections 354, 452, 506, and 376) was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon on 02 August 2025. The court found sufficient evidence of sexual assault based on the victim's medical examination showing a completely torn hymen, biological samples, and eight prosecution witnesses already examined, with trial nearing conclusion. The judge found no substance to release the accused on bail given the serious nature and gravity of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts