Najir Khan Rashid Khan vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - APP — 89/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING on 12th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBU040003172026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
201/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
89/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,khamgaon
Judge
1-DIST.JUDGE-I ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE KHAMGAON.
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
38
Police Station
Jalgaon Jamod
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Najir Khan Rashid Khan
Adv. Kharat MS
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DIST.JUDGE-I ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE KHAMGAON.
Disposed
Order
Order
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Order |
| 10-03-2026 | Order |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 04-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Nazir Khan's anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged assault with sticks causing head injuries. The court found the offences serious, investigation at an early stage with pending evidence collection (clothing seizure and witness statements), and the applicant's alleged role in causing bleeding injuries as substantial grounds to deny bail. The rejection was based on the gravity of offences, investigation status, and risk of witness tampering given the applicant's direct involvement in the alleged assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Nazir Khan's anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged assault with sticks causing head injuries. The court found the offences serious, investigation at an early stage with pending evidence collection (clothing seizure and witness statements), and the applicant's alleged role in causing bleeding injuries as substantial grounds to deny bail. The rejection was based on the gravity of offences, investigation status, and risk of witness tampering given the applicant's direct involvement in the alleged assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts