Pandurang Shivaji Rawankar (Dead) Through LRs(Legal Heir) vs Manjurabai Digambar Rawankar (Dead) Through LRs Advocate - Phirke MB — 6/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s 96 , O 41 R 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.A. - Civil Appeal
CNR: MHBU040002372020
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
112/2020
Filing Date
18-02-2020
Registration No
6/2020
Registration Date
18-02-2020
Court
District and Session Court ,khamgaon
Judge
3-Adhoc DJ - 2 and A.S.J., Khamgaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandurang Shivaji Rawankar (Dead) Through LRs(Legal Heir)
Adv. Takwale SN1.
Arun Ananta Pawar
Respondent(s)
Manjurabai Digambar Rawankar (Dead) Through LRs Advocate - Phirke MB
Kishor Harichandra Tikar
Adv. Mr. M.B.Phirke
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Adhoc DJ - 2 and A.S.J., Khamgaon
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-01-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: The appellants' application under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking permission to examine the TILR (Talati) of Khamgaon as additional evidence has been rejected. The court found that the crucial document (Namuna No. A) was already admitted as documentary evidence during trial and that the appellant failed to demonstrate any necessity for examining the witness, and did not fall within the permitted categories for introducing additional evidence in appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The appellants' application under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking permission to examine the TILR (Talati) of Khamgaon as additional evidence has been rejected. The court found that the crucial document (Namuna No. A) was already admitted as documentary evidence during trial and that the appellant failed to demonstrate any necessity for examining the witness, and did not fall within the permitted categories for introducing additional evidence in appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts