Mayur Vijay Kahate Through Father Vijay Tukaram Kahate vs Nil — 16/2025

Case under Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act Section 8,29. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 11th March 2026.

Civil M.A.

CNR: MHBU040002162025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

21-02-2025

Filing Number

72/2025

Filing Date

21-02-2025

Registration No

16/2025

Registration Date

21-02-2025

Court

District and Session Court ,khamgaon

Judge

1-DIST.JUDGE-I ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE KHAMGAON.

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

HINDU MINORITY AND GUARDIANSHIP ACT Section 8,29

Petitioner(s)

Mayur Vijay Kahate Through Father Vijay Tukaram Kahate

Adv. BHALTADAK GANESH RAMBHAU

Respondent(s)

Nil

Hearing History

Judge: 1-DIST.JUDGE-I ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE KHAMGAON.

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Order

09-03-2026

Order

25-02-2026

Arguments

28-01-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The District Judge of Khamgaon allowed the application of a 15-year-old minor (Mayur Vijay Kahate) through his natural guardian father to sell agricultural property located in Islampur village, Buldhana district, under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956. The court found sufficient grounds of necessity and evident advantage to the minor, as the sale proceeds would fund his higher education. The court imposed a condition that 20% of the sale consideration must be deposited in a fixed deposit in the minor's name until he attains majority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Judge of Khamgaon allowed the application of a 15-year-old minor (Mayur Vijay Kahate) through his natural guardian father to sell agricultural property located in Islampur village, Buldhana district, under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956. The court found sufficient grounds of necessity and evident advantage to the minor, as the sale proceeds would fund his higher education. The court imposed a condition that 20% of the sale consideration must be deposited in a fixed deposit in the minor's name until he attains majority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court ,khamgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case