State of Maharashtra vs Vishnu @ Munna Balkrishna Adhav and other Advocate - Zadokar VV — 12/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,2,N,313,452,506,511,34. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBU040001212016
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
Filing Number
57/2016
Filing Date
22-01-2016
Registration No
12/2016
Registration Date
22-01-2016
Court
District and Session Court ,khamgaon
Judge
3-Adhoc DJ - 2 and A.S.J., Khamgaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
60
Police Station
Tamgaon Sangrampur
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vishnu @ Munna Balkrishna Adhav and other Advocate - Zadokar VV
Laxman Ajabrao Kurwale
Adv. Zadokar VV
Madhav @ Mahadev Pandurang Adhav
Varsha Pramod Ghate
Adv. Sawle NS
Seema Harshwardhan Aagashe
Adv. Sawle NS
Harshwardhan Divakar Aagashe
Adv. Sawle NS
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Adhoc DJ - 2 and A.S.J., Khamgaon
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | Charge |
| 11-03-2026 | Charge |
| 29-01-2026 | Charge |
| 22-12-2025 | Charge |
| 24-11-2025 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the discharge application under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged accused No.5 (Sau. Seema Harshwardhan Agashe) from the proceeding on 21.9.2022. The Special Judge found no sufficient grounds to proceed against her under POSCO Act sections 19-21, as the victim and her mother represented the victim as 19 years old with supporting documents and sonography reports, giving the accused no reason to suspect the victim's minority. Accused No.6 had already been abated due to death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the discharge application under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged accused No.5 (Sau. Seema Harshwardhan Agashe) from the proceeding on 21.9.2022. The Special Judge found no sufficient grounds to proceed against her under POSCO Act sections 19-21, as the victim and her mother represented the victim as 19 years old with supporting documents and sonography reports, giving the accused no reason to suspect the victim's minority. Accused No.6 had already been abated due to death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts