State of Maharashtra vs Yogesh Ramdas Tade — 23/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5). Status: Hearing Before Charge. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBU040001162026
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
e-Filing Number
16-01-2026
Filing Number
72/2026
Filing Date
23-01-2026
Registration No
23/2026
Registration Date
23-01-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,khamgaon
Judge
3-Adhoc DJ - 2 and A.S.J., Khamgaon
FIR Details
FIR Number
490
Police Station
Jalgaon Jamod
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Yogesh Ramdas Tade
Shubham Ramesh Tade
Dnyaneshwar Pandit Kothalkar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Adhoc DJ - 2 and A.S.J., Khamgaon
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Hearing Before Charge |
| 27-04-2026 | Hearing Before Charge |
| 22-04-2026 | Charge |
| 18-04-2026 | Charge |
| 15-04-2026 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon rejected the regular bail application filed by Yogesh Ramdas Tade (22 years old) under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a murder case (Crime No. 490/2025). The court found prima facie evidence of the applicant's involvement in the serious offense of murder where he allegedly beat victim Amol Hissal on the head and body, causing his death. The court rejected the parity argument (that co-accused No. 2 received bail) on grounds that the applicant's role was more significant, and the seriousness of the offense warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon rejected the regular bail application filed by Yogesh Ramdas Tade (22 years old) under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a murder case (Crime No. 490/2025). The court found prima facie evidence of the applicant's involvement in the serious offense of murder where he allegedly beat victim Amol Hissal on the head and body, causing his death. The court rejected the parity argument (that co-accused No. 2 received bail) on grounds that the applicant's role was more significant, and the seriousness of the offense warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts