Simran Sanjay Sharma Represented by Power of Attorney - Chetan Shantiswarup Sharma vs Pradip Shamrao Pahurkar Advocate - Agrawal VR — 3/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.A. - Civil Appeal
CNR: MHBU040000642018
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
31/2018
Filing Date
18-01-2018
Registration No
3/2018
Registration Date
18-01-2018
Court
District and Session Court ,khamgaon
Judge
2-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Simran Sanjay Sharma Represented by Power of Attorney - Chetan Shantiswarup Sharma
Adv. Joshi PR
Respondent(s)
Pradip Shamrao Pahurkar Advocate - Agrawal VR
Sandip Shamrao Pahurkar
Rambai Shamrao Pahurkar
Sarita Pramod Wankhade
Shantaram Sonaji Pahurkar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Judge-2 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Khamgaon
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Compliance |
| 08-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 11-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 28-01-2026 | Compliance |
| 14-01-2026 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Summary: In RCA No. 03/2018 (Simran v. Pradip + 4), the Adhoc District Judge allowed the appellant's application to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 5 (Shantaram Sonaji Pahurkar, who died on 25/02/2023). The court condoned the 18-month delay in filing, finding it necessary to proceed with the appeal on merits. The application was allowed subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 cost to the opposing side on or before the next hearing date, failing which the application would be rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In RCA No. 03/2018 (Simran v. Pradip + 4), the Adhoc District Judge allowed the appellant's application to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased respondent No. 5 (Shantaram Sonaji Pahurkar, who died on 25/02/2023). The court condoned the 18-month delay in filing, finding it necessary to proceed with the appeal on merits. The application was allowed subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 cost to the opposing side on or before the next hearing date, failing which the application would be rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts