Sandhya Gajanan Telkar vs Rakesh Suresh Patil Advocate - Shaikh SM — 214/2018
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
M.A.C.P.
CNR: MHBU010016832018
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1040/2018
Filing Date
26-10-2018
Registration No
214/2018
Registration Date
29-10-2018
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sandhya Gajanan Telkar
Adv. Deshmukh JK
Prachi Gajanan Telekar
Adv. Kolhe RB
Sarthak Gajanan Talekar
Adv. Kolhe RB
Kalawati Pandurang Talekar
Adv. Kolhe RB
Respondent(s)
Rakesh Suresh Patil Advocate - Shaikh SM
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd.
Adv. Pande BB
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 04-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition, not a court order with a final ruling. Dr. Vijay Prabhakar Solanki (Witness No. 2 for claimants in M.A.C.P. No. 214/2018) testified regarding treatment of a road traffic accident patient admitted to his hospital from 05-07 February 2018, detailing injuries, medical procedures, and hospital charges of Rs. 66,900. The witness was cross-examined by one opponent's counsel (the other opponent's counsel was absent) and maintained the accuracy of his testimony regarding patient admission, treatment, and billing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition, not a court order with a final ruling. Dr. Vijay Prabhakar Solanki (Witness No. 2 for claimants in M.A.C.P. No. 214/2018) testified regarding treatment of a road traffic accident patient admitted to his hospital from 05-07 February 2018, detailing injuries, medical procedures, and hospital charges of Rs. 66,900. The witness was cross-examined by one opponent's counsel (the other opponent's counsel was absent) and maintained the accuracy of his testimony regarding patient admission, treatment, and billing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts