State of Maharashtra vs Aadesh Subhash Hiwale Advocate - Giri N.R — 96/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 30th April 2026.
Spl.Case
CNR: MHBU010016262024
Filing Number
786/2024
Filing Date
05-12-2024
Registration No
96/2024
Registration Date
05-12-2024
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
875
Police Station
Buldana
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP Kesale AA
Respondent(s)
Aadesh Subhash Hiwale Advocate - Giri N.R
Hearing History
Judge: 7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Disposed
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 21-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Special Court, Buldhana acquitted accused Aadesh Subhash Hiwale of kidnapping and sexual harassment charges under Section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 12 of the POCSO Act. The court found that key prosecution witnesses—the victim, her mother, and the panch witness—did not corroborate the kidnapping allegations; instead, the victim testified that the accused was her husband with whom she had a consensual two-year relationship. Due to lack of material corroboration from prime witnesses, the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, entitling the accused to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Special Court, Buldhana acquitted accused Aadesh Subhash Hiwale of kidnapping and sexual harassment charges under Section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 12 of the POCSO Act. The court found that key prosecution witnesses—the victim, her mother, and the panch witness—did not corroborate the kidnapping allegations; instead, the victim testified that the accused was her husband with whom she had a consensual two-year relationship. Due to lack of material corroboration from prime witnesses, the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, entitling the accused to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts