State of Maharashtra vs Aadesh Subhash Hiwale Advocate - Giri N.R — 96/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

Spl.Case

CNR: MHBU010016262024

Filing Number

786/2024

Filing Date

05-Dec-2024

Registration No

96/2024

Registration Date

05-Dec-2024

Court

District and Session Court Buldhana

Judge

7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

875

Police Station

Buldana

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP Kesale AA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Aadesh Subhash Hiwale Advocate - Giri N.R

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary The Special Court, Buldhana acquitted accused Aadesh Subhash Hiwale of kidnapping and sexual harassment charges under Section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 12 of the POCSO Act. The court found that key prosecution witnesses—the victim, her mother, and the panch witness—did not corroborate the kidnapping allegations; instead, the victim testified that the accused was her husband with whom she had a consensual two-year relationship. Due to lack of material corroboration from prime witnesses, the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, entitling the accused to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  6. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  10. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  11. 06-Jan-2026

    List of Witness

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  12. 11-Dec-2025

    List of Witness

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  13. 26-Nov-2025

    Charge

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  14. 03-Nov-2025

    Charge

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  15. 08-Sep-2025

    Charge

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  16. 19-Aug-2025

    Report

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  17. 02-Jul-2025

    Documents

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  18. 07-May-2025

    Documents

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  19. 02-May-2025

    Filing of Surety

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  20. 10-Apr-2025

    Filing of Surety

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  21. 17-Feb-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  22. 06-Jan-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  23. 06-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 05-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 96/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Special Court, Buldhana acquitted accused Aadesh Subhash Hiwale of kidnapping and sexual harassment charges under Section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 12 of the POCSO Act. The court found that key prosecution witnesses—the victim, her mother, and the panch witness—did not corroborate the kidnapping allegations; instead, the victim testified that the accused was her husband with whom she had a consensual two-year relationship. Due to lack of material corroboration from prime witnesses, the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, entitling the accused to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case