State of Maharashtra vs Aadesh Subhash Hiwale Advocate - Giri N.R — 96/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 30th April 2026.

Spl.Case

CNR: MHBU010016262024

Case disposed

Filing Number

786/2024

Filing Date

05-12-2024

Registration No

96/2024

Registration Date

05-12-2024

Court

District and Session Court Buldhana

Judge

7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

Decision Date

30th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

875

Police Station

Buldana

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP Kesale AA

Respondent(s)

Aadesh Subhash Hiwale Advocate - Giri N.R

Hearing History

Judge: 7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

30-04-2026

Disposed

28-04-2026

Arguments

21-04-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

16-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

30-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

30-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary The Special Court, Buldhana acquitted accused Aadesh Subhash Hiwale of kidnapping and sexual harassment charges under Section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 12 of the POCSO Act. The court found that key prosecution witnesses—the victim, her mother, and the panch witness—did not corroborate the kidnapping allegations; instead, the victim testified that the accused was her husband with whom she had a consensual two-year relationship. Due to lack of material corroboration from prime witnesses, the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, entitling the accused to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Special Court, Buldhana acquitted accused Aadesh Subhash Hiwale of kidnapping and sexual harassment charges under Section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 12 of the POCSO Act. The court found that key prosecution witnesses—the victim, her mother, and the panch witness—did not corroborate the kidnapping allegations; instead, the victim testified that the accused was her husband with whom she had a consensual two-year relationship. Due to lack of material corroboration from prime witnesses, the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, entitling the accused to acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court Buldhana All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case