State of Maharashtra vs Sayyad Sarfaraj Sayyad Khalil Advocate - Gothi DP — 54/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,354(A). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.

Spl.Case

CNR: MHBU010015382022

Case disposed

Filing Number

715/2022

Filing Date

12-12-2022

Registration No

54/2022

Registration Date

12-12-2022

Court

District and Session Court Buldhana

Judge

8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

683

Police Station

Buldana

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 354,354(A)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 8,12

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP Sonali Saoji

Respondent(s)

Sayyad Sarfaraj Sayyad Khalil Advocate - Gothi DP

Hearing History

Judge: 8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

17-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Arguments

05-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

25-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

20-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The Special Judge, Buldhana acquitted Sayyad Sarfaraj Sayyad Khalil of charges under IPC sections 354, 354-A and POCSO Act sections 8, 12 for allegedly sexually harassing a minor. The court found that the victim, eyewitnesses, and incident witnesses did not support the prosecution's case, with the victim disowning the FIR contents and denying the incident occurred, making it impossible to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge, Buldhana acquitted Sayyad Sarfaraj Sayyad Khalil of charges under IPC sections 354, 354-A and POCSO Act sections 8, 12 for allegedly sexually harassing a minor. The court found that the victim, eyewitnesses, and incident witnesses did not support the prosecution's case, with the victim disowning the FIR contents and denying the incident occurred, making it impossible to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court Buldhana All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case