Ravindra Deviprasad Jaiswal vs The Buldana Urban Co-Op.Credit Society,Buldana. — 32/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397,399,401. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th March 2026.

Cri.Rev.App.

CNR: MHBU010015282025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

10-12-2025

Filing Number

876/2025

Filing Date

12-12-2025

Registration No

32/2025

Registration Date

12-12-2025

Court

District and Session Court Buldhana

Judge

14-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 397,399,401

Petitioner(s)

Ravindra Deviprasad Jaiswal

Adv. Waghmare PS

Respondent(s)

The Buldana Urban Co-Op.Credit Society,Buldana.

State of Maharashtra

Adv. DGP

Hearing History

Judge: 14-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana

17-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Written Statement

26-02-2026

Written Statement

20-01-2026

Written Statement

20-12-2025

Awaiting Notice

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana dismissed the criminal revision petition challenging the issuance of process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that at the stage of issuing process, the magistrate need only establish prima facie grounds, and the accused's detailed defense—including claims that the cheque was merely a security cheque and no legally enforceable debt existed—are matters for trial. The court ruled that even security cheques can trigger Section 138 liability if presented against a legally enforceable obligation, and found no illegality in the magistrate's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana dismissed the criminal revision petition challenging the issuance of process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that at the stage of issuing process, the magistrate need only establish prima facie grounds, and the accused's detailed defense—including claims that the cheque was merely a security cheque and no legally enforceable debt existed—are matters for trial. The court ruled that even security cheques can trigger Section 138 liability if presented against a legally enforceable obligation, and found no illegality in the magistrate's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court Buldhana All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case