Shaikh Imran Shaikh Aman vs Vaibhav Laxmi Mahila Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. — 90/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHBU010015192025
e-Filing Number
11-12-2025
Filing Number
871/2025
Filing Date
11-12-2025
Registration No
90/2025
Registration Date
11-12-2025
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shaikh Imran Shaikh Aman
Adv. Shaikh Shakil Ismail
Respondent(s)
Vaibhav Laxmi Mahila Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
Disposed
Hearing
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 26-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 13-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 06-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge rejected the accused's application for case transfer under Section 448 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, finding that general allegations of delay and adjournments without specific evidence of judicial bias or improper conduct do not justify transfer. The court held that transfer powers must be exercised sparingly only in exceptional circumstances with cogent evidence of real apprehension of unfair trial, and directed the trial court to expedite disposal of the 11-year-old Negotiable Instruments Act case with cooperation from both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge rejected the accused's application for case transfer under Section 448 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, finding that general allegations of delay and adjournments without specific evidence of judicial bias or improper conduct do not justify transfer. The court held that transfer powers must be exercised sparingly only in exceptional circumstances with cogent evidence of real apprehension of unfair trial, and directed the trial court to expedite disposal of the 11-year-old Negotiable Instruments Act case with cooperation from both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts