State of Maharashtra vs Vinod alias Gajanan Pundlik Shejol — 119/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,85,352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHBU010015162025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

869/2025

Filing Date

11-12-2025

Registration No

119/2025

Registration Date

11-12-2025

Court

District and Session Court Buldhana

Judge

14-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

18

Police Station

Amdapur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,85,352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP Hiwale SP

Respondent(s)

Vinod alias Gajanan Pundlik Shejol

Kamal Pundlik Shejol

Hearing History

Judge: 14-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana

06-05-2026

Disposed

29-04-2026

Judgment

22-04-2026

Arguments

07-04-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

27-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

06-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Buldhana acquitted both accused—Vinod Shejol (41) and Kamal Pundlik Shejol (72)—of charges under Sections 108, 85, and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in connection with the suicide of Prabhavati. While the court established that suicide occurred, it found insufficient evidence of abetment, cruelty, or instigation by the accused, noting critical gaps including no complaint filed during the victim's lifetime, delayed FIR reporting (4 days), and lack of specific instances of harassment with clear nexus to the suicide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Buldhana acquitted both accused—Vinod Shejol (41) and Kamal Pundlik Shejol (72)—of charges under Sections 108, 85, and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in connection with the suicide of Prabhavati. While the court established that suicide occurred, it found insufficient evidence of abetment, cruelty, or instigation by the accused, noting critical gaps including no complaint filed during the victim's lifetime, delayed FIR reporting (4 days), and lack of specific instances of harassment with clear nexus to the suicide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court Buldhana All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case