State of Maharashtra vs Vinod alias Gajanan Pundlik Shejol — 119/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,85,352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBU010015162025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
869/2025
Filing Date
11-12-2025
Registration No
119/2025
Registration Date
11-12-2025
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
14-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
18
Police Station
Amdapur
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP Hiwale SP
Respondent(s)
Vinod alias Gajanan Pundlik Shejol
Kamal Pundlik Shejol
Hearing History
Judge: 14-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 29-04-2026 | Judgment | |
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Buldhana acquitted both accused—Vinod Shejol (41) and Kamal Pundlik Shejol (72)—of charges under Sections 108, 85, and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in connection with the suicide of Prabhavati. While the court established that suicide occurred, it found insufficient evidence of abetment, cruelty, or instigation by the accused, noting critical gaps including no complaint filed during the victim's lifetime, delayed FIR reporting (4 days), and lack of specific instances of harassment with clear nexus to the suicide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Buldhana acquitted both accused—Vinod Shejol (41) and Kamal Pundlik Shejol (72)—of charges under Sections 108, 85, and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in connection with the suicide of Prabhavati. While the court established that suicide occurred, it found insufficient evidence of abetment, cruelty, or instigation by the accused, noting critical gaps including no complaint filed during the victim's lifetime, delayed FIR reporting (4 days), and lack of specific instances of harassment with clear nexus to the suicide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts