State of Maharashtra vs Kashiram Shivram Kusalkar Advocate - Sakhare NB — 117/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1). Status: Fixing date of Hearing. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBU010014842025
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
857/2025
Filing Date
04-12-2025
Registration No
117/2025
Registration Date
06-12-2025
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
FIR Details
FIR Number
288
Police Station
Amdapur
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. DGP
Respondent(s)
Kashiram Shivram Kusalkar Advocate - Sakhare NB
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
Appearance
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing |
| 21-04-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing |
| 09-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 08-04-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing |
| 25-03-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application filed by Kashiram Shivram Kusalkar (age 67), accused of murder under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, was rejected by the Sessions Judge, Buldana on 11-02-2026. The court found a prima facie case based on circumstantial evidence including alleged motive (past enmity over a 30-year-old rape acquittal), recovery of blood-stained clothes pursuant to the accused's disclosure, and his proximity to the crime scene. The court held that given the gravity of the offense, risk of witness tampering, and completed investigation, continued detention was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application filed by Kashiram Shivram Kusalkar (age 67), accused of murder under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, was rejected by the Sessions Judge, Buldana on 11-02-2026. The court found a prima facie case based on circumstantial evidence including alleged motive (past enmity over a 30-year-old rape acquittal), recovery of blood-stained clothes pursuant to the accused's disclosure, and his proximity to the crime scene. The court held that given the gravity of the offense, risk of witness tampering, and completed investigation, continued detention was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts