State of Maharashtra vs Kashiram Shivram Kusalkar Advocate - Sakhare NB — 117/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1). Status: Fixing date of Hearing. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHBU010014842025

Fixing date of Hearing

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

Filing Number

857/2025

Filing Date

04-12-2025

Registration No

117/2025

Registration Date

06-12-2025

Court

District and Session Court Buldhana

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana

FIR Details

FIR Number

288

Police Station

Amdapur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. DGP

Respondent(s)

Kashiram Shivram Kusalkar Advocate - Sakhare NB

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana

18-05-2026

Fixing date of Hearing

21-04-2026

Fixing date of Hearing

09-04-2026

Appearance

08-04-2026

Fixing date of Hearing

25-03-2026

Fixing date of Hearing

Interim Orders

08-12-2025
Charge
11-02-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The bail application filed by Kashiram Shivram Kusalkar (age 67), accused of murder under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, was rejected by the Sessions Judge, Buldana on 11-02-2026. The court found a prima facie case based on circumstantial evidence including alleged motive (past enmity over a 30-year-old rape acquittal), recovery of blood-stained clothes pursuant to the accused's disclosure, and his proximity to the crime scene. The court held that given the gravity of the offense, risk of witness tampering, and completed investigation, continued detention was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The bail application filed by Kashiram Shivram Kusalkar (age 67), accused of murder under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, was rejected by the Sessions Judge, Buldana on 11-02-2026. The court found a prima facie case based on circumstantial evidence including alleged motive (past enmity over a 30-year-old rape acquittal), recovery of blood-stained clothes pursuant to the accused's disclosure, and his proximity to the crime scene. The court held that given the gravity of the offense, risk of witness tampering, and completed investigation, continued detention was justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court Buldhana All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case