Siddharth Namdev More vs Vijendra Sigh Jugal Kishore Chouhan Advocate - ex — 116/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
M.A.C.P.
CNR: MHBU010013972021
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
776/2021
Filing Date
14-12-2021
Registration No
116/2021
Registration Date
14-12-2021
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Siddharth Namdev More
Adv. Deshmukh SJ
Respondent(s)
Vijendra Sigh Jugal Kishore Chouhan Advocate - ex
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Adv. Chavan DS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 04-04-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This document contains witness depositions in motor accident claims cases (M.A.C.P. No.122/2022 and M.A.C.P. No.116/2021) before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Buldana. The witnesses—a neurosurgeon, pharmacist, and medical practitioners—provided testimony regarding medical treatment, hospitalization bills, and medicines purchased by accident injury victims. The proceedings went exparte against one opponent, with cross-examinations by opposing counsel. No final order/judgment is present; these are evidence deposition records dated 24-03-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document contains witness depositions in motor accident claims cases (M.A.C.P. No.122/2022 and M.A.C.P. No.116/2021) before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Buldana. The witnesses—a neurosurgeon, pharmacist, and medical practitioners—provided testimony regarding medical treatment, hospitalization bills, and medicines purchased by accident injury victims. The proceedings went exparte against one opponent, with cross-examinations by opposing counsel. No final order/judgment is present; these are evidence deposition records dated 24-03-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts