State of Maharashtra vs Vishal @ Balu Dilip Kasare Advocate - Javed Sk. — 88/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 306,498A,323,504,34,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBU010013522023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
725/2023
Filing Date
16-12-2023
Registration No
88/2023
Registration Date
16-12-2023
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
14-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
318
Police Station
Amdapur
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. DGP
Respondent(s)
Vishal @ Balu Dilip Kasare Advocate - Javed Sk.
Anita Satish Khadse
Adv. Javed Sk.
Dilip Govinda Kasare
Adv. Javed Sk.
Nanda Dilip Kasare
Adv. Javed Sk.
Hearing History
Judge: 14-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 20-04-2026 | Judgment | |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 12-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Court at Buldhana acquitted all four accused persons (Vishal Kasare, Anita Khadse, Dilip Kasare, and Nanda Kasare) of charges under Sections 306, 498-A, 323, and 504 of the IPC, finding that while the deceased Sapana committed suicide by hanging, the prosecution failed to prove that the accused abetted or instigated her suicide beyond reasonable doubt. The court found inconsistencies in witness testimony, lack of credible evidence of harassment, and absence of direct acts of incitement proximate to the suicide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Additional Sessions Court at Buldhana acquitted all four accused persons (Vishal Kasare, Anita Khadse, Dilip Kasare, and Nanda Kasare) of charges under Sections 306, 498-A, 323, and 504 of the IPC, finding that while the deceased Sapana committed suicide by hanging, the prosecution failed to prove that the accused abetted or instigated her suicide beyond reasonable doubt. The court found inconsistencies in witness testimony, lack of credible evidence of harassment, and absence of direct acts of incitement proximate to the suicide. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts