Vishal Sham Chavan vs Mohan Prabhu Chavan Advocate - Burje SR — 161/2018
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,140. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
M.A.C.P.
CNR: MHBU010013502018
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
839/2018
Filing Date
28-08-2018
Registration No
161/2018
Registration Date
28-08-2018
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vishal Sham Chavan
Adv. Deshmukh SJ
Respondent(s)
Mohan Prabhu Chavan Advocate - Burje SR
Vijay Mohan Chavan
Adv. Burje SR
Shriram General Insurance Co.Ltd., Aurangabad
Adv. Chavan DS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 21-04-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 04-04-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 21-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: In M.A.C.P. No.161/2018 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Buldana, the court forfeited the right of Opponents Nos. 1 and 2 to lead evidence (dated 21-02-2026). Despite sufficient opportunities and the claimant closing his evidence on 13.01.2026, the opponents and their advocate were absent when called for evidence and failed to file any application for extension of time. The tribunal found them uninterested in presenting their case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In M.A.C.P. No.161/2018 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Buldana, the court forfeited the right of Opponents Nos. 1 and 2 to lead evidence (dated 21-02-2026). Despite sufficient opportunities and the claimant closing his evidence on 13.01.2026, the opponents and their advocate were absent when called for evidence and failed to file any application for extension of time. The tribunal found them uninterested in presenting their case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts