State of Maharashtra vs Kisan Ananda Mandalkar Advocate - Ballal AS, Ballal AS — 74/2023
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(1),20(6)(i)(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.
Spl.Case
CNR: MHBU010013262023
Next Hearing
22nd May 2026
Filing Number
709/2023
Filing Date
11-12-2023
Registration No
74/2023
Registration Date
11-12-2023
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
FIR Details
FIR Number
336
Police Station
Deulgaon Raja
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. DGP
Respondent(s)
Kisan Ananda Mandalkar Advocate - Ballal AS, Ballal AS
Hearing History
Judge: 7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Evidence
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
List of Witness
List of Witness
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 13-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 05-01-2026 | List of Witness |
| 03-12-2025 | List of Witness |
Interim Orders
The application filed by Kisan Ananda Mandalkar under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for release of a motorcycle and mobile phone on supratnama has been rejected. The court found that the applicant, as the owner of the motorcycle, was found in possession of ganja (400 grams), placing the case under the first scenario where the vehicle cannot be released until the accused discharges the reverse burden of proof. Additionally, the mobile phone could not be returned as the applicant failed to prove ownership—the tax invoice showed it registered under a different person's name (Datta Mandalkar). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The application filed by Kisan Ananda Mandalkar under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for release of a motorcycle and mobile phone on supratnama has been rejected. The court found that the applicant, as the owner of the motorcycle, was found in possession of ganja (400 grams), placing the case under the first scenario where the vehicle cannot be released until the accused discharges the reverse burden of proof. Additionally, the mobile phone could not be returned as the applicant failed to prove ownership—the tax invoice showed it registered under a different person's name (Datta Mandalkar). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts