State of Maharashtra vs Kishor Shamrav Gaikwad Advocate - Javed Sk. — 96/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238(a),85,3(5). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBU010012982025
Next Hearing
22nd May 2026
Filing Number
743/2025
Filing Date
15-10-2025
Registration No
96/2025
Registration Date
15-10-2025
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
FIR Details
FIR Number
205
Police Station
Amdapur
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP Kesale AA
Respondent(s)
Kishor Shamrav Gaikwad Advocate - Javed Sk.
Shamrav Maroti Gaikwad
Adv. Javed Sk.
Sakhubai Shamrav Gaikwad
Adv. Javed Sk.
Madhukar Shamrav Gaikwad
Adv. Dinode AR
Hearing History
Judge: 8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Evidence
Evidence
Order
Order
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-04-2026 | Order |
| 20-04-2026 | Order |
| 10-04-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Bail Application Rejected — The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana rejected the bail application of Accused No. 4 (Madhukar Shamrao Gaikwad) in Session Case No. 96/2025 filed under Section 483 BNS 2023. The court found prima-facie sufficient material pointing to the accused's guilt in the murder of his sister-in-law, including his confessional statement leading to discovery of murder weapons and evidence of an illicit relationship. The court directed both parties to expedite the trial despite the circumstantial nature of the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Bail Application Rejected — The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana rejected the bail application of Accused No. 4 (Madhukar Shamrao Gaikwad) in Session Case No. 96/2025 filed under Section 483 BNS 2023. The court found prima-facie sufficient material pointing to the accused's guilt in the murder of his sister-in-law, including his confessional statement leading to discovery of murder weapons and evidence of an illicit relationship. The court directed both parties to expedite the trial despite the circumstantial nature of the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts