State of Maharashtra vs Mohshinalishah Khwajaalishah Advocate - Raj Shaikh — 95/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBU010012972025
Filing Number
742/2025
Filing Date
15-10-2025
Registration No
95/2025
Registration Date
15-10-2025
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
405
Police Station
Buldana
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. DGP Bhatkar VL
Respondent(s)
Mohshinalishah Khwajaalishah Advocate - Raj Shaikh
Anisshah Munirshah
Adv. Raj Shaikh
Hearing History
Judge: 8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
JUDGMENT SUMMARY: The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana acquitted two accused (Mohsinalishah Khwajaalishah and Anishshah Munirshah) of charges under Section 353 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting municipal clerks during an encroachment removal operation on May 25, 2024. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the informant and key eyewitnesses denied the alleged assault occurred, and crucial procedural violations (lack of written notice to accused, absence of independent witnesses) undermined the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
JUDGMENT SUMMARY: The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana acquitted two accused (Mohsinalishah Khwajaalishah and Anishshah Munirshah) of charges under Section 353 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting municipal clerks during an encroachment removal operation on May 25, 2024. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the informant and key eyewitnesses denied the alleged assault occurred, and crucial procedural violations (lack of written notice to accused, absence of independent witnesses) undermined the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts