State of Maharashtra vs Mohshinalishah Khwajaalishah Advocate - Raj Shaikh — 95/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th May 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHBU010012972025

Case disposed

Filing Number

742/2025

Filing Date

15-10-2025

Registration No

95/2025

Registration Date

15-10-2025

Court

District and Session Court Buldhana

Judge

8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

405

Police Station

Buldana

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 353,34

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. DGP Bhatkar VL

Respondent(s)

Mohshinalishah Khwajaalishah Advocate - Raj Shaikh

Anisshah Munirshah

Adv. Raj Shaikh

Hearing History

Judge: 8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

07-05-2026

Disposed

21-04-2026

Judgment

06-04-2026

Arguments

23-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

12-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

07-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

JUDGMENT SUMMARY: The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana acquitted two accused (Mohsinalishah Khwajaalishah and Anishshah Munirshah) of charges under Section 353 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting municipal clerks during an encroachment removal operation on May 25, 2024. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the informant and key eyewitnesses denied the alleged assault occurred, and crucial procedural violations (lack of written notice to accused, absence of independent witnesses) undermined the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

25-02-2026
Evidence
25-02-2026
Evidence
25-02-2026
Evidence
11-03-2026
Evidence
12-03-2026
Evidence
23-03-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

JUDGMENT SUMMARY: The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana acquitted two accused (Mohsinalishah Khwajaalishah and Anishshah Munirshah) of charges under Section 353 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting municipal clerks during an encroachment removal operation on May 25, 2024. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the informant and key eyewitnesses denied the alleged assault occurred, and crucial procedural violations (lack of written notice to accused, absence of independent witnesses) undermined the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court Buldhana All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case