State of Maharashtra vs Vishnu Ramrao Karpe Advocate - Sakhare NB — 71/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 65(2). Status: Awaiting Muddemal. Next hearing: 28th May 2026.
Spl.Case
CNR: MHBU010011952025
Next Hearing
28th May 2026
Filing Number
684/2025
Filing Date
16-09-2025
Registration No
71/2025
Registration Date
16-09-2025
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
FIR Details
FIR Number
220
Police Station
Dhad
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. DGP Bhatkar VL
Respondent(s)
Vishnu Ramrao Karpe Advocate - Sakhare NB
Shobha Vishnu Karpe
Hearing History
Judge: 7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
| 02-05-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
| 18-04-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
| 07-04-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
| 24-03-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application filed by Vishnu Ramrao Karpe under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been rejected. Karpe, aged 48, was accused of repeatedly sexually assaulting his 10-year-old stepdaughter, causing physical injuries, with the victim's mother (Accused No. 2) failing to restrain him, in violation of Sections 65(2) BNS and Sections 4, 4(2), 8, 10, 12 of the POCSO Act. The court found the crime heinous and serious in nature, noting the victim's terror was so severe she fled home to report the assault, and therefore deemed Karpe ineligible for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application filed by Vishnu Ramrao Karpe under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been rejected. Karpe, aged 48, was accused of repeatedly sexually assaulting his 10-year-old stepdaughter, causing physical injuries, with the victim's mother (Accused No. 2) failing to restrain him, in violation of Sections 65(2) BNS and Sections 4, 4(2), 8, 10, 12 of the POCSO Act. The court found the crime heinous and serious in nature, noting the victim's terror was so severe she fled home to report the assault, and therefore deemed Karpe ineligible for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts