Kailas Sukhdev Hivale vs Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation — 97/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 04th August 2026.

Issues Next hearing 04-Aug-2026 this date has passed

M.A.C.P.

CNR: MHBU010009902025

e-Filing Number

08-08-2025

Filing Number

435/2025

Filing Date

08-Aug-2025

Registration No

97/2025

Registration Date

08-Aug-2025

Court

District and Session Court Buldhana

Judge

14-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

1.Kailas Sukhdev Hivale

Adv. Deshmukh SJ

Respondent(s)

1.Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation

Case History

04-Aug-2026

Next hearingPending
29-Apr-2026

Issues

District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana
11-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary: The MACT (Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal) Buldhana allowed the application filed by MSRTC to set aside the "No Written Statement" order dated 22.12.2025 and permitted the filing of a late written statement. The court accepted MSRTC's explanation regarding unavailability of information and recognized its bona fide effort to promptly proceed with the motor vehicle accident petition filed under Section 166 of the M.V. Act, 1989. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
11-Mar-2026

Issues

District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana
16-Feb-2026

Hearing

District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana
14-Jan-2026

Written Statement

District Judge-4 and Addl. Sj Buldana
22-Dec-2025

Written Statement

District Judge-4 and Addl. Sj Buldana
23-Sep-2025

Written Statement

District Judge-4 and Addl. Sj Buldana
11-Aug-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
08-Aug-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 97/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The MACT (Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal) Buldhana allowed the application filed by MSRTC to set aside the "No Written Statement" order dated 22.12.2025 and permitted the filing of a late written statement. The court accepted MSRTC's explanation regarding unavailability of information and recognized its bona fide effort to promptly proceed with the motor vehicle accident petition filed under Section 166 of the M.V. Act, 1989. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.