Ravindra Devidas Sable vs Surekha Kishor Agrawal Advocate - Paithane G — 51/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415,. Status: Order. Next hearing: 16th May 2026.
Cri.Appeal
CNR: MHBU010009802025
Next Hearing
16th May 2026
e-Filing Number
07-08-2025
Filing Number
569/2025
Filing Date
07-08-2025
Registration No
51/2025
Registration Date
07-08-2025
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ravindra Devidas Sable
Adv. Badge RW
Respondent(s)
Surekha Kishor Agrawal Advocate - Paithane G
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
Order
Hearing
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Paper Book
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Order | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 05-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 07-01-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 08-12-2025 | Paper Book |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Sessions Court, Buldana allowed respondent No.1's application and permitted withdrawal of Rs. 3,25,000 deposited by appellant Ravindra Devidas Sabale towards suspension of sentence in a cheque bounce case. However, under Section 148(3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, if the appeal is allowed and the appellant is acquitted, the respondent must repay the compensation amount with accrued interest within the prescribed timeframe, for which an undertaking is required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Sessions Court, Buldana allowed respondent No.1's application and permitted withdrawal of Rs. 3,25,000 deposited by appellant Ravindra Devidas Sabale towards suspension of sentence in a cheque bounce case. However, under Section 148(3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, if the appeal is allowed and the appellant is acquitted, the respondent must repay the compensation amount with accrued interest within the prescribed timeframe, for which an undertaking is required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts