State of Maharashtra vs Sarjerao Mahadeo Kakad Advocate - Thakre AE — 54/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,337,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBU010009742023
Filing Number
497/2023
Filing Date
13-09-2023
Registration No
54/2023
Registration Date
13-09-2023
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
132
Police Station
Sindkhed Raja
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP Sonali Saoji
Respondent(s)
Sarjerao Mahadeo Kakad Advocate - Thakre AE
Hearing History
Judge: 8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana acquitted accused Sarjerao Mahadeo Kakad of charges under IPC sections 307, 323, 337, 504, and 506 on March 11, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the informant (wife) and injured witness did not support the allegations of pouring diesel with intent to murder, causing hurt, and criminal intimidation. The sole police officer's testimony was insufficient to establish the accused's culpability without corroborating victim accounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana acquitted accused Sarjerao Mahadeo Kakad of charges under IPC sections 307, 323, 337, 504, and 506 on March 11, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the informant (wife) and injured witness did not support the allegations of pouring diesel with intent to murder, causing hurt, and criminal intimidation. The sole police officer's testimony was insufficient to establish the accused's culpability without corroborating victim accounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts