Kailas Dnyaneshwar Khedekar vs State of Maharashtra — 14/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th March 2026.

Cri.Appeal

CNR: MHBU010006472024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-05-2024

Filing Number

310/2024

Filing Date

20-05-2024

Registration No

14/2024

Registration Date

20-05-2024

Court

District and Session Court Buldhana

Judge

7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 374

Petitioner(s)

Kailas Dnyaneshwar Khedekar

Adv. Salve D.A

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

10-03-2026

Disposed

28-01-2026

Hearing

22-12-2025

Hearing

17-11-2025

Hearing

07-10-2025

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Buldhana acquitted the appellant of drunk driving charges under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, finding that the prosecution failed to provide mandatory chemical evidence (breath or blood test) to prove the offense. Although the trial court had convicted him based on circumstantial observations by police officers, the appellate court emphasized that strict proof through proper testing procedures is legally necessary for such convictions. The court set aside the conviction, ordered return of the Rs. 10,000 fine, and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Buldhana acquitted the appellant of drunk driving charges under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, finding that the prosecution failed to provide mandatory chemical evidence (breath or blood test) to prove the offense. Although the trial court had convicted him based on circumstantial observations by police officers, the appellate court emphasized that strict proof through proper testing procedures is legally necessary for such convictions. The court set aside the conviction, ordered return of the Rs. 10,000 fine, and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court Buldhana All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case