Punjaram Vishwnath Kharat vs Dnyaneshwar Suresh Dhakane — 4/2024

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 31st March 2026.

MACP. M.A.

CNR: MHBU010005292024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-04-2024

Filing Number

276/2024

Filing Date

25-04-2024

Registration No

4/2024

Registration Date

25-04-2024

Court

District and Session Court Buldhana

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana

Decision Date

31st March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

Punjaram Vishwnath Kharat

Adv. Ingle ST

Yashoda Vishwanath Kharat

Adv. INGLE SANJAY TUKARAM

Sagar Vishwanath Kharat

Adv. INGLE SANJAY TUKARAM

Kalpana Siddharth Pandagale

Adv. INGLE SANJAY TUKARAM

Respondent(s)

Dnyaneshwar Suresh Dhakane

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana

31-03-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

Order on Exh

11-03-2026

Reply/Say

04-03-2026

Reply/Say

25-02-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

31-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed the condonation of delay application and ordered registration of the claim petition for compensation arising from a fatal vehicular accident dated 27.01.2023, filed nine months beyond the six-month statutory limitation period. The court held that since motor accident compensation is social legislation and the police officer had a mandatory duty to forward accident details to the tribunal (which appears not to have been done), the petitioners should not be denied relief solely on grounds of delay; the limitation issue was kept open for further adjudication as it was pending before the Supreme Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed the condonation of delay application and ordered registration of the claim petition for compensation arising from a fatal vehicular accident dated 27.01.2023, filed nine months beyond the six-month statutory limitation period. The court held that since motor accident compensation is social legislation and the police officer had a mandatory duty to forward accident details to the tribunal (which appears not to have been done), the petitioners should not be denied relief solely on grounds of delay; the limitation issue was kept open for further adjudication as it was pending before the Supreme Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court Buldhana All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case