State of Maharashtra vs Pramod Ganpatrao Pohare Advocate - Chopade SM — 21/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,332,324,504,506,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBU010005112019
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
150/2019
Filing Date
01-03-2019
Registration No
21/2019
Registration Date
01-03-2019
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
14-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana
FIR Details
FIR Number
198
Police Station
Buldana
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Pramod Ganpatrao Pohare Advocate - Chopade SM
Sandip Anandrao Wankhede
Gajanan Atmaram Shegokar
Hearing History
Judge: 14-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the discharge application filed by accused Pramod Ganpatrao Pohare under Section 227 CrPC in S.T. No. 21/2019 (State v. Pramod and others). The court found sufficient grounds to proceed against the accused for offences under Sections 353, 332, 324, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC, noting that the FIR disclosed the accused's alleged role and the investigation officer's additions to charges were supported by the complainant's report. The case shall proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the discharge application filed by accused Pramod Ganpatrao Pohare under Section 227 CrPC in S.T. No. 21/2019 (State v. Pramod and others). The court found sufficient grounds to proceed against the accused for offences under Sections 353, 332, 324, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC, noting that the FIR disclosed the accused's alleged role and the investigation officer's additions to charges were supported by the complainant's report. The case shall proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts