Nalini Bhaskar Patil vs Dipak Arun Munjal Advocate - Patil GD — 38/2016
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
M.A.C.P.
CNR: MHBU010005042016
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
302/2016
Filing Date
28-03-2016
Registration No
38/2016
Registration Date
28-03-2016
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nalini Bhaskar Patil
Adv. Deshmukh JK
Respondent(s)
Dipak Arun Munjal Advocate - Patil GD
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
Noor Taher Patel
Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Judgment
Judgment
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Arguments | |
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 06-04-2026 | Judgment | |
| 02-04-2026 | Judgment |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) Buldana partly allowed the application filed by legal heirs of deceased Bhaskar Nilkanth Patil, who died in a 2014 road accident involving a Cruiser Jeep and Truck on National Highway No. 6. The Tribunal awarded No Fault Liability (NFL) compensation of Rs. 50,000 to be paid jointly and severally by the Cruiser Jeep owner (Opponent No. 1) and its insurer (Opponent No. 2) within one month, with 8% annual interest on default. The Truck owner's insurer (Opponent No. 4) was exonerated as the F.I.R. established the Cruiser was the offending vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) Buldana partly allowed the application filed by legal heirs of deceased Bhaskar Nilkanth Patil, who died in a 2014 road accident involving a Cruiser Jeep and Truck on National Highway No. 6. The Tribunal awarded No Fault Liability (NFL) compensation of Rs. 50,000 to be paid jointly and severally by the Cruiser Jeep owner (Opponent No. 1) and its insurer (Opponent No. 2) within one month, with 8% annual interest on default. The Truck owner's insurer (Opponent No. 4) was exonerated as the F.I.R. established the Cruiser was the offending vehicle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts