Shadab Khan Sakhawat Khan vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP — 58/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 20th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBU010003862026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
140/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
58/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
54
Police Station
Andhera
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shadab Khan Sakhawat Khan
Adv. Rangnath GV
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Disposed
Order
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | Order | |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana granted anticipatory bail to Shadab Khan Sakhawat Khan in a sexual assault case involving allegations spanning 2021-2026. The court found that while the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act provisions were not prima facie applicable, suspicious circumstances—including a 5-year delay in reporting and inconsistencies in the victim's account—suggested possible false implication. The applicant was released on a Rs. 50,000 personal bond with strict conditions including weekly police station attendance, a non-contact clause with the complainant and witnesses, and submission of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana granted anticipatory bail to Shadab Khan Sakhawat Khan in a sexual assault case involving allegations spanning 2021-2026. The court found that while the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act provisions were not prima facie applicable, suspicious circumstances—including a 5-year delay in reporting and inconsistencies in the victim's account—suggested possible false implication. The applicant was released on a Rs. 50,000 personal bond with strict conditions including weekly police station attendance, a non-contact clause with the complainant and witnesses, and submission of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts