Shaikh Irfan Shaikh Isa vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP — 57/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBU010003852026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
139/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
57/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
638
Police Station
Chikhli
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shaikh Irfan Shaikh Isa
Adv. Wahid SK
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Disposed
Order
Order
Hearing
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Order |
| 12-03-2026 | Order |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 09-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana, granted bail to Shaikh Irfan Shaikh Isa in a cattle theft case (Crime No. 638/2025) involving charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act, 1960. The court reasoned that the FIR was originally lodged against three unknown persons, investigation was complete with charge-sheet filed, and the investigation did not seek the accused's custody even upon first production, making continued detention unjustified. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with a solvent surety of equal amount, subject to strict conditions including non-tampering with evidence, regular trial attendance, and submission of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana, granted bail to Shaikh Irfan Shaikh Isa in a cattle theft case (Crime No. 638/2025) involving charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Prevention of Animal Cruelty Act, 1960. The court reasoned that the FIR was originally lodged against three unknown persons, investigation was complete with charge-sheet filed, and the investigation did not seek the accused's custody even upon first production, making continued detention unjustified. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with a solvent surety of equal amount, subject to strict conditions including non-tampering with evidence, regular trial attendance, and submission of identity documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts