Syed Khaja Mohiaddin vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP — 56/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 09th April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBU010003812026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
135/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
56/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
734
Police Station
Buldana
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Syed Khaja Mohiaddin
Adv. Abuzar Ansari
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | Order |
| 04-04-2026 | Order |
| 01-04-2026 | Order |
| 30-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana granted anticipatory bail to Syed Khaja Mohiaddin in a case involving alleged forgery of experience certificates (valued at Rs. 11.08 Crore) submitted during a 2009 tender process for irrigation work. The court found that custodial interrogation was unwarranted given the 16-year delay in filing charges, absence of prima-facie evidence of forgery, and that similar certificates were accepted without objection when submitted. The applicant was released on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with conditions including bi-monthly police station attendance and a prohibition against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana granted anticipatory bail to Syed Khaja Mohiaddin in a case involving alleged forgery of experience certificates (valued at Rs. 11.08 Crore) submitted during a 2009 tender process for irrigation work. The court found that custodial interrogation was unwarranted given the 16-year delay in filing charges, absence of prima-facie evidence of forgery, and that similar certificates were accepted without objection when submitted. The applicant was released on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with conditions including bi-monthly police station attendance and a prohibition against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts