Vishnu Sukhdeo Bhalekar vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP — 53/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 11th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBU010003772026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
132/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
53/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
150
Police Station
Chikhli
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vishnu Sukhdeo Bhalekar
Adv. Sakhare NB
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Disposed
Order
Citation
Citation
Citation
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order | |
| 07-03-2026 | Citation | |
| 06-03-2026 | Citation | |
| 05-03-2026 | Citation |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana granted bail to Vishnu Sukhdeo Bhalekar on March 11, 2026, in a case involving alleged abusive comments made toward Buddhist community members during a Dhammadan (alms-giving) event. The court found that witness statements were already recorded and further custody served no purpose, warranting release with stringent conditions including a ₹50,000 personal bond, prohibition on contacting witnesses, and restriction from entering the informant's village until charge-sheet filing. The charges involved abusive speech under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections 351(3) and 352. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana granted bail to Vishnu Sukhdeo Bhalekar on March 11, 2026, in a case involving alleged abusive comments made toward Buddhist community members during a Dhammadan (alms-giving) event. The court found that witness statements were already recorded and further custody served no purpose, warranting release with stringent conditions including a ₹50,000 personal bond, prohibition on contacting witnesses, and restriction from entering the informant's village until charge-sheet filing. The charges involved abusive speech under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections 351(3) and 352. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts