Shivshankar Pralhad Regude vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP — 52/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 11th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln.

CNR: MHBU010003582026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

131/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

52/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

District and Session Court Buldhana

Judge

7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

150

Police Station

Chikhli

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(r),3(1)(s)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 351(3)

Petitioner(s)

Shivshankar Pralhad Regude

Adv. Sakhare NB

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP

Hearing History

Judge: 7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Order

07-03-2026

Citation

06-03-2026

Citation

05-03-2026

Citation

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted anticipatory bail to Shivshankar Pralhad Regude, finding that while a prima facie case under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was made out against co-accused Vishnu Bhalekar for caste-based abuse, no such case existed against the applicant, whose alleged abusive statements did not target the victim's caste. The court imposed stringent conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000, weekly police attendance, and a prohibition on entering the complainant's village until charge-sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to Shivshankar Pralhad Regude, finding that while a prima facie case under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was made out against co-accused Vishnu Bhalekar for caste-based abuse, no such case existed against the applicant, whose alleged abusive statements did not target the victim's caste. The court imposed stringent conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000, weekly police attendance, and a prohibition on entering the complainant's village until charge-sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court Buldhana All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case