State of Maharashtra vs Nilesh Ranjit Bhakkad Advocate - Meher RD — 15/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 75,78,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 01st April 2026.
Spl.Case
CNR: MHBU010003542025
Filing Number
183/2025
Filing Date
04-03-2025
Registration No
15/2025
Registration Date
04-03-2025
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
03
Police Station
Dhad
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP Kesale AA
Respondent(s)
Nilesh Ranjit Bhakkad Advocate - Meher RD
Saurav Gokul Dhanvat
Adv. Meher RD
Hearing History
Judge: 7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Disposed
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 31-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 24-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The Special Court, Buldhana acquitted both accused (Nilesh Ranjeet Bhakkad and Saurav Gokul Dhanawat) of charges under Sections 75, 78 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 12 of the POCSO Act. The court found that the victim and her mother (key prosecution witnesses) completely retracted their allegations during testimony, denying the alleged incidents of sexual harassment and unwelcome contact occurred, thereby failing to establish the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The Special Court, Buldhana acquitted both accused (Nilesh Ranjeet Bhakkad and Saurav Gokul Dhanawat) of charges under Sections 75, 78 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 12 of the POCSO Act. The court found that the victim and her mother (key prosecution witnesses) completely retracted their allegations during testimony, denying the alleged incidents of sexual harassment and unwelcome contact occurred, thereby failing to establish the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts