Sachin Shankarlal Jaiswal vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP — 15/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHBU010003262026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2026
Filing Number
125/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
15/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sachin Shankarlal Jaiswal
Adv. Javed Sk.
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The Sessions Judge, Buldana allowed the applicant's transfer petition and ordered that Miscellaneous Criminal Application No.12/2024 be withdrawn from the Adhoc District Judge's court and transferred to the District Judge's court, where the main corruption case (Special ACB Case No.42/2024) is pending. The court held that since both matters arise from the same crime and corruption offenses are exclusively triable by a Special Judge, consolidating them before a single court ensures consistency in judicial orders and prevents contradictory findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 15/2026
Summary The Sessions Judge, Buldana allowed the applicant's transfer petition and ordered that Miscellaneous Criminal Application No.12/2024 be withdrawn from the Adhoc District Judge's court and transferred to the District Judge's court, where the main corruption case (Special ACB Case No.42/2024) is pending. The court held that since both matters arise from the same crime and corruption offenses are exclusively triable by a Special Judge, consolidating them before a single court ensures consistency in judicial orders and prevents contradictory findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts