State of Maharashtra vs Akash Bhagwan Gore Advocate - Dinode AR — 15/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376(B),376(2)(F),376(3),354(A),506. Status: Hearing Before Charge. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
Spl.Case
CNR: MHBU010003082023
Next Hearing
15th July 2026
Filing Number
155/2023
Filing Date
18-03-2023
Registration No
15/2023
Registration Date
18-03-2023
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
14-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana
FIR Details
FIR Number
52
Police Station
Chikhli
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. DGP
Respondent(s)
Akash Bhagwan Gore Advocate - Dinode AR
Hearing History
Judge: 14-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
Hearing Before Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing Before Charge |
| 21-01-2026 | Hearing Before Charge |
| 20-12-2025 | Hearing Before Charge |
| 14-11-2025 | Hearing Before Charge |
| 24-09-2025 | Hearing Before Charge |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application of Aakash Bhagwan Gore, accused of rape and sexual assault of a minor (Sections 376, 376(2)(f)(i), 354-A, 506 IPC and Sections 4, 8, 12 POCSO Act), is allowed. The Additional Sessions Judge granted regular bail on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 30,000 with one surety of equal amount, noting that the investigation was completed, charge-sheet filed, and the applicant had already spent five months in custody, with minimal risk of contact between the accused and victim due to their residence in different districts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application of Aakash Bhagwan Gore, accused of rape and sexual assault of a minor (Sections 376, 376(2)(f)(i), 354-A, 506 IPC and Sections 4, 8, 12 POCSO Act), is allowed. The Additional Sessions Judge granted regular bail on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 30,000 with one surety of equal amount, noting that the investigation was completed, charge-sheet filed, and the applicant had already spent five months in custody, with minimal risk of contact between the accused and victim due to their residence in different districts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts