Macchindra Sukhdeo Pawar vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP — 16/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Status: R and P Ready. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
Cri.Appeal
CNR: MHBU010002642026
e-Filing Number
13-02-2026
Filing Number
110/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
16/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Macchindra Sukhdeo Pawar
Adv. Bhujbal SA
-
2.Sandip Prakash Pawar
Adv. Bhujbal SA
-
3.Dnyaneshwar Jagdeo Pawar
Adv. Bhujbal SA
-
4.Vishnu Macchindra Pawar
Adv. Bhujbal SA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP
Case History
-
20-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
R and P Ready
District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
-
10-Mar-2026
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
-
06-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The application for suspension of sentence is allowed. The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana, stayed the effect and operation of the trial court's conviction judgment (dated 30.01.2026) against Macchindra Pawar and others for offences under IPC Sections 324 and 323, pending disposal of their appeal. The accused must furnish personal bond and surety bond of Rs. 25,000 each and undertake to attend the appeal regularly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Compliance
District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 16/2026
Summary: The application for suspension of sentence is allowed. The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana, stayed the effect and operation of the trial court's conviction judgment (dated 30.01.2026) against Macchindra Pawar and others for offences under IPC Sections 324 and 323, pending disposal of their appeal. The accused must furnish personal bond and surety bond of Rs. 25,000 each and undertake to attend the appeal regularly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts