State of Maharashtra vs Vishalsing Ramsing Thakur — 9/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310(2),115(2),351(2),352,. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
Spl.Case
CNR: MHBU010002172025
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
115/2025
Filing Date
06-02-2025
Registration No
9/2025
Registration Date
06-02-2025
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
14-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana
FIR Details
FIR Number
384
Police Station
Amdapur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. DGP
Respondent(s)
Vishalsing Ramsing Thakur
Sumersing Ramsing Thakur
Manoj Fakira Pawar
Shakil Khan Anis Khan Pathan
Jivansing alias Jitu Rajendrasing Thakur
Hearing History
Judge: 14-District Judge-3 and Additional Sessions Judge Buldana
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 25-02-2026 | Charge | |
| 24-12-2025 | Charge | |
| 28-10-2025 | Charge | |
| 04-09-2025 | Charge |
Interim Orders
BAIL GRANTED The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana granted regular bail to applicants Manoj Fakira Pawar and Shakilkha Aniskha Pathan in Crime No. 384/2024 involving charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Each applicant was released on a Personal Recognizance Bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety each, subject to conditions that they not misuse bail or obstruct trial proceedings. The court found that since the charge-sheet had been filed and investigation completed, further custodial interrogation was unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
BAIL GRANTED The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana granted regular bail to applicants Manoj Fakira Pawar and Shakilkha Aniskha Pathan in Crime No. 384/2024 involving charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Each applicant was released on a Personal Recognizance Bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety each, subject to conditions that they not misuse bail or obstruct trial proceedings. The court found that since the charge-sheet had been filed and investigation completed, further custodial interrogation was unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts