Sunil Shankar Akhade vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP — 33/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBU010002052026
e-Filing Number
12-02-2026
Filing Number
92/2026
Filing Date
12-02-2026
Registration No
33/2026
Registration Date
12-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
229
Police Station
Buldana
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunil Shankar Akhade
Adv. Sawadatkar NP
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Disposed
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 31-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 17-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 05-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge granted Sunil Shankar Akhade's anticipatory bail application in an electricity theft case (Rs. 1,25,546 alleged theft under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act). The court found the applicant's apprehension of arrest justified due to a 22-day unexplained delay in filing the FIR after the MSEB raid, and confirmed the interim anticipatory bail already granted, noting no misuse of bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Additional Sessions Judge granted Sunil Shankar Akhade's anticipatory bail application in an electricity theft case (Rs. 1,25,546 alleged theft under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act). The court found the applicant's apprehension of arrest justified due to a 22-day unexplained delay in filing the FIR after the MSEB raid, and confirmed the interim anticipatory bail already granted, noting no misuse of bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts