State of Maharashtra vs Aashish Suresh Kamble Advocate - Sakhare NB — 4/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376(2)(j), 354-a, 354-c, 354-d, 506. Status: Awaiting Muddemal. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Spl.Case

CNR: MHBU010002032019

Awaiting Muddemal

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

56/2019

Filing Date

17-01-2019

Registration No

4/2019

Registration Date

17-01-2019

Court

District and Session Court Buldhana

Judge

8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

FIR Details

FIR Number

1182

Police Station

Buldana

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 376(2)(j), 354-a, 354-c, 354-d, 506
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4, 8, 14
Information Technology Act Section 67-b

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP Sonali Saoji

Respondent(s)

Aashish Suresh Kamble Advocate - Sakhare NB

Hearing History

Judge: 8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

08-05-2026

Awaiting Muddemal

10-03-2026

Awaiting Muddemal

14-01-2026

Awaiting Muddemal

10-12-2025

Awaiting Muddemal

04-10-2025

Awaiting Muddemal

Interim Orders

14-11-2019
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The District Court of Buldana allowed the petitioner's application for condonation of delay in filing a civil appeal against a plaint rejection order. The court found the 13-day delay was unintentional, caused by misplacement of certified copies and court vacation, and thus not negligent. The application was granted subject to the petitioner paying Rs. 500 as costs to the respondent, and the appeal was permitted to be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Court of Buldana allowed the petitioner's application for condonation of delay in filing a civil appeal against a plaint rejection order. The court found the 13-day delay was unintentional, caused by misplacement of certified copies and court vacation, and thus not negligent. The application was granted subject to the petitioner paying Rs. 500 as costs to the respondent, and the appeal was permitted to be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court Buldhana All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case