Dhananjay Ramdas Ingle vs State of Maharashtra — 8/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
Cri.Appeal
CNR: MHBU010001112025
Next Hearing
13th May 2026
e-Filing Number
20-01-2025
Filing Number
66/2025
Filing Date
21-01-2025
Registration No
8/2025
Registration Date
21-01-2025
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhananjay Ramdas Ingle
Adv. Rangnath GV
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Shafiq Shaikh Rauf Shaikh Decease Through Rehana Shaikh Shafiq Shaikh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 07-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 11-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 08-01-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary In Criminal Appeal No. 8/2025, the Sessions Judge, Buldana allowed the application and permitted Respondent No. 2 to withdraw Rs. 2,40,000 deposited by the appellant towards suspension of sentence. However, if the appellant is acquitted on appeal, Respondent No. 2 must repay the amount with accrued interest as per Section 148(3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and must file an undertaking to this effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Criminal Appeal No. 8/2025, the Sessions Judge, Buldana allowed the application and permitted Respondent No. 2 to withdraw Rs. 2,40,000 deposited by the appellant towards suspension of sentence. However, if the appellant is acquitted on appeal, Respondent No. 2 must repay the amount with accrued interest as per Section 148(3) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and must file an undertaking to this effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts