Nitin Tryambak Sonone vs Rukhmini Nitin Sonone Advocate - Gothi DP — 5/2026

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHBU010001062026

e-Filing Number

03-02-2026

Filing Number

65/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

5/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Court Buldhana

Judge

7-District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nitin Tryambak Sonone

    Adv. Raj Shaikh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rukhmini Nitin Sonone Advocate - Gothi DP

  2. 2.Harsh Nitin Sonone

  3. 3.Samruddhi Nitin Sonone

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana granted the applicant's petition to condone a delay of 4 months 3 days in filing a criminal appeal, finding that the applicant's lack of legal knowledge and inadvertent filing of a criminal revision in the interim constituted justifiable reasons for the delay. The court upheld the fundamental right to challenge trial court orders and allowed the criminal appeal to be registered as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana granted the applicant's petition to condone a delay of 4 months 3 days in filing a criminal appeal, finding that the applicant's lack of legal knowledge and inadvertent filing of a criminal revision in the interim constituted justifiable reasons for the delay. The court upheld the fundamental right to challenge trial court orders and allowed the criminal appeal to be registered as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case