Minal Nilesh Borse vs Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Pune Advocate - Pande BB — 13/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 02nd May 2026.
M.A.C.P.
CNR: MHBU010000482021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
39/2021
Filing Date
11-01-2021
Registration No
13/2021
Registration Date
11-01-2021
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Minal Nilesh Borse
Adv. Sanap SP
Shravni Nilesh Borse
Ansh Nilesh Borse
Mangla Bhaskar Borse
Bhaskar Chandrabhan Borse
Respondent(s)
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Pune Advocate - Pande BB
Mohdj Rafique Khan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Buldana
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 15-04-2026 | Judgment | |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Buldana awarded compensation of Rs. 97,32,200 to the dependents of Nilesh Bhaskar Borse, who died in a motor vehicle accident on November 5, 2020, caused by a TATA Tempo driver's rash and negligent driving. The tribunal rejected the insurance company's defenses regarding the driver's licensing and policy breach, finding that an LMV license was valid for operating the commercial delivery vehicle, and held both the vehicle owner and insurer jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation with 7% annual interest from the petition date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Buldana awarded compensation of Rs. 97,32,200 to the dependents of Nilesh Bhaskar Borse, who died in a motor vehicle accident on November 5, 2020, caused by a TATA Tempo driver's rash and negligent driving. The tribunal rejected the insurance company's defenses regarding the driver's licensing and policy breach, finding that an LMV license was valid for operating the commercial delivery vehicle, and held both the vehicle owner and insurer jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation with 7% annual interest from the petition date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts