Dattatray Bhaskar Nanaware U/g Shobha Bhaskar Nanaware vs Sarjerao Dashrath Nanaware Advocate - Mhaske S.B. — 246/2024

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 22-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHBI190005822024

e-Filing Number

12-03-2024

Filing Number

318/2024

Filing Date

19-Mar-2024

Registration No

246/2024

Registration Date

19-Mar-2024

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Ashti

Judge

1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dattatray Bhaskar Nanaware U/g Shobha Bhaskar Nanaware

    Adv. GARJE BAPU BHASKARRAO

  2. 2.Shobha Bhaskar Nanaware

    Adv. GARJE BAPU BHASKARRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sarjerao Dashrath Nanaware Advocate - Mhaske S.B.

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  7. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  8. 15-Oct-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary: The petition is dismissed. The court held that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience in their favor, or irreparable injury. The court noted that the petitioner concealed material facts and delayed in bringing the matter, and that some property parcels had already been sold by the previous rights holder. Consequently, the interim injunction sought to prevent transfer of the property to defendants 1, 4-6 is not granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 15-Oct-2025

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  10. 10-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  11. 01-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  12. 16-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  13. 30-Aug-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.

  14. 31-Jul-2025

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  15. 18-Jun-2025

    W.S. and Say

    3rd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  16. 15-Apr-2025

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  17. 20-Mar-2025

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  18. 03-Feb-2025

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  19. 20-Jan-2025

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  20. 12-Dec-2024

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  21. 08-Nov-2024

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  22. 10-Oct-2024

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  23. 27-Sep-2024

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  24. 28-Aug-2024

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  25. 01-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  26. 09-Jul-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  27. 02-May-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge, J.D. and J.m.f.c., Ashti.

  28. 19-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 19-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 246/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition is dismissed. The court held that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience in their favor, or irreparable injury. The court noted that the petitioner concealed material facts and delayed in bringing the matter, and that some property parcels had already been sold by the previous rights holder. Consequently, the interim injunction sought to prevent transfer of the property to defendants 1, 4-6 is not granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case