Hafij Noormohamad Tamboli other 3 vs Sureshkumar Motilal Kankariya other 9 Advocate - Deshpande S.T. — 202/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,22. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI190005682023
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
261/2023
Filing Date
17-03-2023
Registration No
202/2023
Registration Date
17-03-2023
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division, Ashti
Judge
1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hafij Noormohamad Tamboli other 3
Adv. Sayyed Y.T.
Sanjay Balbhim Dhobale
Sanjay Kantilal Meher
Hemant Babulal Pokharna
Respondent(s)
Sureshkumar Motilal Kankariya other 9 Advocate - Deshpande S.T.
Ashok Pannalal Gandhi
Adv. Anarase B.B.
Vijay Ashok Gandhi
Adv. Anarase B.B.
Umesh Ashok Gandhi
Adv. Anarase B.B.
Poonam Ashok Gandhi
Adv. Anarase B.B.
Keshav Dattatray Chavhan
Adv. Joshi Ajay A.
Sushila Vishnu Chavhan
Adv. Joshi Ajay A.
Utkarsha Shriram Kardile
Adv. Joshi Ajay A.
Atharv Vishnu Chavhan
Adv. Joshi Ajay A.
Vijaya Madhukar Shivanikar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Ashti.
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 12-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 21-02-2026 | Compliance |
| 29-01-2026 | Compliance |
| 02-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed defendants 2-5's application to amend their written statement to include four property boundaries at the north side that were inadvertently omitted, characterizing the amendment as a technical and typographical error. The defendants were ordered to pay Rs. 700 as costs to the plaintiffs and file the amended written statement within the stipulated time, with plaintiffs retaining the right to lead additional evidence at an appropriate stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed defendants 2-5's application to amend their written statement to include four property boundaries at the north side that were inadvertently omitted, characterizing the amendment as a technical and typographical error. The defendants were ordered to pay Rs. 700 as costs to the plaintiffs and file the amended written statement within the stipulated time, with plaintiffs retaining the right to lead additional evidence at an appropriate stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts